Saturday, October 31, 2015
This Week in Texas Methodist History November 1
Texas
Conference Trivia Question: Which Bishop
Was the Last One to Preside before A. Frank Smith Began his 26 Year Consecutive
Presiding Streak?
The Answer;
Bishop Hiram Boaz at Marvin MECS in Tyler, Nov. 1-5, 1933.
Bishop Boaz, born in Kentucky
in 1866, moved with his family to Texas as a
small boy and attended both Sam Houston Normal (today’s Sam
Houston State
University) and Southwestern University. He taught school in Fort
Worth but then received a license to preach and served churches in Fort Worth, Abilene, and Dublin. He became president of Polytechnic (today’s Texas Wesleyan
University) and earned
praise for his vigorous leadership.
Boaz failed in his effort to move his alma mater,
Southwestern, to Fort Worth,
but became the vice-president of SMU as it was being organized. Boaz was given much of the responsibility of
raising the funds to get SMU started. He
accomplished that and went back to Polytechnic for a second tenure. He served as Secretary of the Board of Church
Extension briefly but was called back to Texas
in 1920 to become SMU’s second president.
In 1922 he was elected bishop of the MECS and
assigned to the Asian conferences. After
one quadrennium presiding there, he was assigned conferences in the United States
where he served until his retirement in 1938.
He lived until 1962. His remains
were laid to rest at Sparkman Hillcrest Memorial Park
in Dallas.
Marvin MECS in Tyler was a frequent host of the Texas Annual
Conference. Its commodious sanctuary,
convenient location, good rail connections, and generous Tyler residents who offered accommodations
made it a good place to meet. Just three
years earlier, in September, 1930, the Daisy Bradford #3 had come in just a few
miles from Tyler. While much of the rest of the United States was coping with the Great
Depression, the Tyler
area was experiencing a boom.
Two Tyler
laymen were invited to address the Annual Conference. The first was Galloway Calhoun, the subject
of a previous post. http://txmethhistory.blogspot.com/search?q=calhoun
The other was also an attorney, Earl Mayfield,
(1881-1964) who had served as U. S.
Senator from Texas
1923-1929. Mayfield had emerged
victorious in the 1922 Democratic Primary over James, “Pa” Ferguson.
Ferguson’s
impeachment as governor did not disqualify him for the Senate seat.
Mayfield became known as the preferred candidate
of the Ku Klux Klan or “Klanidate” as the newspapers reported it. Ferguson,
although the son of a Methodist preacher, was a “wet,” and the Klan favored
“dry” candidates.
Mayfield was unable to win re-nomination in 1928
so he moved to Tyler,
close to his birthplace of Overton. There is no record of what the two laymen said
to the Conference.
Saturday, October 24, 2015
This Week in Texas Methodist History October 25
El Paso
Methodist Preacher, Rev. A. C. Murphy, Offers Church Building for School
Although El Paso
was far removed from eastern Texas and its
tradition of racial segregation, it was still part of Texas, and that meant separate facilities
and institutions for African American and European American residents.
In 1886 a dispute over facilities for African
American students arose that involved the young Methodist preacher, the Rev.
Alfred C. Murphy.
The El Paso School Board conducted a scholastic
census and counted 775 children and young people between the ages of 6 and
17. Of those only 14 were African
American. In accordance with the
educational law of the 1880’s the City Council provided the facility, and the
School Board operated the school. The
City Council required a minimum student body of 20 before it would build a
school.
Instead of sending those 14 students to racially integrated
schools, the School Board rented the old African American Methodist Church
building for $8/month. The congregation
had moved out of the building to more modern facilities, so one can imagine the
poor quality of the facility provided.
The 1885-1886 academic year found the African American students in the
old, inadequate building.
As the 1886-1887 academic year approached, the
community was split between competing offers from the Baptists and Methodists
who both wished to hold the school in their buildings. The new Methodist church, which had replaced
the dilapidated one, was pastored by the Rev. Alfred C. Murphy, born 1859 in Rochester, New
York. Murphy
was a graduate of Howard
University and Wayland
Seminary, also in Washington, D. C.
(Wayland later merged with Richmond Theological Seminary to become Virginia Union University.) The School Board decided on the new Methodist
building and hired Murphy to teach there.
It was common for preachers of the era to teach
during the week and preach on Sundays. The
El Paso Methodist Church
was obviously not equipped with desks, globes, scientific apparatus, or other accouterments necessary for high quality instruction. Students sat on the same benches which the
congregation used for pews, and there was a blackboard. In 1886 students
provided their own textbooks.
State-provided textbooks did not appear in Texas schools until well into the 20th
century.
Rev. A. C. Murphy was a prominent citizen of El Paso throughout the
1890s. He was often mentioned in the El Paso Times as a civic leader. In 1888 he was the main orator at the El Paso
Juneteenth celebration. The reporter for
the Times recorded the event with the
highest praise. He was an officer in the
Knights of Pythias.
Murphy appears in the 1900 US Census, still living
in El Paso with
his occupation listed as teacher. In the
1910 Census he is enumerated in Denver,
Colorado, having lost his wife
but with three of his sons (9 to 13 years old) still at home. His occupation is listed as school
janitor. . There must be a story behind
those census reports.
Saturday, October 17, 2015
This Week in Texas Methodist History October 18
Rockey Spring Quarterly Conference Passes
Resolution to Create Colored Mission in Harrison County, October 21, 1843
Clearing the raft of logs from the Red River by
the U. S. Corps of Engineers under Captain Henry Miller Shreve had immediate
effects upon Texas
and also Texas Methodism. A town named Shreveport was platted where the Texas Trail crossed the Red River. Shreveport replaced Natchitoches
as the head of navigation on the Red River, and steamboats soon found their way
up Cypress Bayou to Jefferson. The Texas Trail soon became the preferred
entry from the United States
to Texas, taking business away from the Red River crossings at Natchitoches,
Louisiana, and Fulton, Arkansas.
Unfortunately many of the people coming to Texas during the period were enslaved persons being
marched in chains to new lands being opened up in Texas for cotton production. Shreveport
developed a slave market, not as large as New
Orleans, but still quite significant. Many of the exploited souls ended up around Marshall
and Jefferson. The US census of
1850 revealed a very large percentage of the population there to be enslaved
people.
The question of ”Colored Missions” or “African
Missions” occupied a prominent place in the deliberations of Texas Methodism
before emancipation. Many Methodists
were driven by the Gospel mandate to “preach the Gospel to all persons.” Some of them interpreted that scripture to
mean that such universality of preaching was a prerequisite for the second
coming of Christ.
One of the problems was that “Colored Missions”
depended upon the cooperation of the slaveholders, and their attitudes varied
widely. Some viewed religion as another
form of social control. Some refused to
allow any contact by outsiders. Still
others were ambivalent on the subject.
Methodism’s special problem was that the core
source region for preachers volunteering for the Republic
of Texas was the Ohio
Valley, and especially the states of Ohio and Illinois. Many slaveholders looked suspiciously upon
anyone from the North. William O’Connor,
one of the 1842 recruits from Ohio
had ruffled some feathers on the subject. Robert Alexander’s brother, David,
had complained to Littleton Fowler, the Presiding Elder of the district who had
recruited O’Conner, about possible “abolitionist” remarks.
O’Conner died in Marshall in Aug. 1843, at the age of 27, and
possibly since he was no longer alive, Harrison County Methodists began discussion
of establishing a “Colored Mission,” this time under a preacher who would be “safe”
on the slavery issue.
The Quarterly Conference of the Harrison Circuit
met at Rockey(sic) Spring on October 21, 1843 and passed a resolution to
establish such a mission. One of the
sentences in the resolution is especially revealing
In the
Southern States where the M. E. Church has established missions to the slaves
the consequence has been that of a great moral and religious reformation of
this class of population which tended to make them honest, industrious and more
obedient to those who controuled them greatly to the advantage of both
both the servants and masters.
The resolution directed John Woolam to secure the
permission of slaveholders before an actually appointment would be made.
The Texas Conference met the following December,
and there was no appointment to a “Colored Mission.” Harrison,
though, had two preachers, William Craig and John Woolam. One suspects that Woolam was directing his
efforts to enslaved people.
Saturday, October 10, 2015
This Week in Texas Methodist History October 11
Preachers Object to Advocate’s Strong Stand on Prohibition, October 16, 1885
When G. W. Briggs took over the editorship of the Texas Christian Advocate, he unabashedly
proclaimed that he intended to use the denominational organ in the political
battle over the prohibition of alcoholic beverages. Texas
dries felt encouraged by the added weight of the Advocate stance as they pushed
for a statewide referendum to be put before the voters. Such a referendum was held in 1888, but
failed to secure a majority with the all-male electorate in that year.
There were a few Methodist preachers bold enough
to voice their opposition to the new editorial emphasis. Their opposition was not in favor of
alcoholic beverages, but their belief that the church should stay out of
secular politics.
Briggs sent an appeal to Texas preachers, asking them to submit
letters to the Advocate on the
subject of prohibition. Rev. Scott of
Willis composed a letter criticizing the involvement of the Advocate in politics. Briggs did not print the letter. He would have been better off just printing
the letter. His refusal to print letters
disagreeing with his position just created more problems. Rev. John C. S. Baird of Coleman City
heard of the refusal to print the Scott letter.
When Baird’s letter to the Advocate was also denied publication, he sent his protest to the Galveston Daily News which was all too
happy to report on the minor Methodist journalistic spat.
Baird’s letter ended this way
Southern
Methodist preachers are entitled to all the rights and privileges of American
citizenship, but their citizen rights should be exercised as citizens, not as
pastors of Southern Methodist churches nor as editors or paid correspondents of
Southern Methodist newspapers. As citizens claiming to be quiet and peaceable
subjects, we are entitled to such laws as will protect life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness. As members and
ministers of the church of the Son of God, we are to remember that “ the
weapons of our warfare are not carnal but are mighty through God (not the
legislature), to the pulling down of strongholds, and the bringing into
captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.”
Saturday, October 03, 2015
This Week in Texas Methodist History October 4
Representative Elkanah Brush Rebuffed in Attempt to
Name Chaplain, October 5, 1836
Many Texans can recite in great detail the stirring
events of the first months of 1836. In just
a few months, from January to April of that year the events that shaped our historical
memory came in rapid fire order---the Siege of the Alamo, the Declaration of Independence,
Goliad, the Runaway Scrape, and the Battle of San Jacinto—all occurred in a brief
span that we Texas historians facetiously call “Texas Lent,” approximately
40 days that created a new country.
Far fewer Texans can recite the events that occurred
in the second half of 1836 as the scene shifted from winning independence to creating
a government strong enough to protect the people from the various military
threats that still existed, provide a stable currency, perfect titles to land, create
courts for the administration of justice, provide postal service, and so on.
The establishment of a new government under a new constitution
took place fairly easily, mainly because the founders used the United States
as a template. Except for Tejanos
including such men as Navarro, De Zavalla, and Seguin, all
of the new military and political leaders were recent arrivals from the United States. Many of them had been politically active
before they emigrated so by the fall of 1836 the Provisional Government which
had won the Revolution was replaced by a constitutional republic.
As previously noted the founders used the United
States as a template, but in the area of church-state relations, the writers of
the Texas Constitution of 1836---mainly Jeffersonian in their outlook—were able
to write the strongest possible separation language into the founding
document.
At one time during the constitutional debates it
was proposed that clergy should be denied the vote. That was changed to a prohibition of
clergymen holding office in the final version.
A primary interest of the founders was their
fervent belief that the government should not favor any denomination or sect
over another. In addition to their
Jeffersonian outlook, they also remembered the privileges of the Roman Catholic
Church under Mexican rule.
Representative Elkanah Brush of Refugio was
initially thwarted in his attempt to have a chaplain named for the Texas House
of Representatives. On October 5, 1836,
he moved that the House appoint a Chaplain whose main duty would be opening
each day’s session with a prayer. The
Chaplain would receive the same pay as the members—five dollars per day.
Representative Thomas Jefferson Green* of Bexar,
who had previously served in the Florida Legislature, objected. His argument makes sense even
today.
. . .if he
were a Methodist, he would feel much aggrieved at seeing a Catholic priest
perform mass previous to their deliberations in that assembly; he therefore objected to the resolution. For
his part he did not know but that 600 different sects might claim the same privilege.
Brush’s resolution was tabled, but about a month
later revived. Both the House and the
Senate appointed Chaplains—including Littleton Fowler.
Some of us are still troubled by the presence of
legislative chaplains. Tax monies collected from all
persons---believers, non-believers alike—and used to pay someone to deliver a
prayer seems like a direct governmental subsidy of religion and inevitably privileges one religion over another.
*Green later moved to California and was elected to the State
Senat. As a very young man he had served in the North Carolina Assembly. He thus became one of the few people to serve in fourdifferent
legislatures.