This Week in Texas Methodist History August 2
Houston’s Tri-Weekly Telegram Sneers at
Possibility of MEC and MECS Unification, Aug. 7, 1865
If you think you’ve lived
through tumultuous times, you might want to consider what was happening 150
years ago this week. The war resulting
in the greatest loss of life and property in the nation’s history was finally
over. Slavery was abolished. The president who led the nation was
assassinated, and some of the conspirators in the plot that killed him had
already been tried and hanged.
Congressional factions were at odds with each other over Reconstruction
policy. The former Confederate states were
in the process of writing new state constitutions and re-forming
governments. In every road, village, and
city in the nation one could see wounded veterans, many of whom were now
amputees or sightless. Southern roads were also
crowded with former enslaved persons desperately searching for family members
who had been snatched from them in heart-wrenching sales. It was truly a time of turmoil like no other
in our nation’s history.
In times of turmoil, we humans
need secure institutions to provide stability and unity—of all the religious institutions
in the United States in August, 1865, none was more important that the
Methodist church. Unfortunately both the northern and southern branches were
still trying to make sense of the new realities. They had
separated only twenty years earlier.
Methodist leaders in both the North and South remembered the bonds of
friendship they had once known. The Disciplines of the northern and southern
branches had not diverged in matters of faith and practice in the intervening
years. The cause of the separation—slavery—did
not exist. Why should the two branches
remain separate? Why indeed?
Immediately after the end of
the Civil War the MEC bishops met at Erie,
Pa., to discuss just such a
reunion. The bishops passed several
resolutions. One was expressing loyalty
to President Johnson so long as he kept the peace with other nations, did not
try to roll back abolition, and administered justice fairly. They also dealt with the most difficult question
of all---What would be the status of the freedman in the Methodist Church? Before the war Methodist churches in the South
counted thousands of enslaved persons on their membership rolls. Some were even licensed as exhorters and
local preachers. If the northern and southern branches
reunited, what would be their status?
Naturally there were different answers
to such momentous questions. The MECS
bishops met at Columbus, Ga., in July, in part to formulate a
response to the MEC bishops. Meanwhile
the various annual conferences responded to local situations in a variety of
ways.
The owner/editor of Houston's Tri-Weekly Telegram, Edward H. Cushing
(1829-1879) although Vermont
born and Dartmouth-educated, became an enthusiastic supporter of the southern
cause. In the August 7, 1865 edition of
his paper he lambasted the possibility of reunion of the northern and southern
branches of Methodism. He cited the
insults of some Northern Methodists who had talked about the South as a new
mission field. The confiscation of some
MECS churches by federal troops and the capture of the Publishing House in Nashville added fuel to
the flames of hatred. The unreconstructed Cushing naturally blamed
the MEC. He said the MECS would be
willing to enter into reunification talks, but the arrogant attitude of the
North kept them from such discussions.
The real question though, was
the freedmen. In August 1865 neither the
North nor the South had an answer. Over
the next decade each side formulated different responses. The MECS “spun off” its African American
churches into a new denomination called the Colored Methodist Episcopal Church
South (CME). Initially the MEC created
racially integrated annual conferences in the South, but at the 1872 General
Conference passed legislation allowing those annual conferences to split along
racial lines. They did so, and the
result was African American MEC annual conferences and European American annual
conferences existing side by side in the southern states. Their only contact was at General
Conference.
Readers of this column will
know that reunification eventually did occur in 1939. Long after the Civil War and Reconstruction
animosity, the South eventually got the price it demanded for reunification.
Reunification was achieved at the cost of humiliating the African
American members of the MEC by placing them in the so-called Central
Jurisdiction—thereby making sure no African-American bishop would ever preside over
a European-American annual conference in the South. "Real" unification did not occur until 1968.
1 Comments:
1939 was not American Methodism's original sin - that happened in 1787 when the African descended congregants were sent to the balcony of St. George's MEC in Philadelphia - resulting, by the grace of God, in the African Methodist Episcopal Church. 1787, 1844, 1939 and 1968 are vitally important dates for the United Methodist Church to remember, especially as the church is reminded by current events that the work of racial reconciliation is not done.
Post a Comment
<< Home