This Week in Texas Methodist History Nov. 20
Bishop Pierce Presides at Texas
Annual Conference, “Lord, Deliver Methodism from Popular Votes,” Nov. 24, 1858
Bishop George Foster Pierce presided over the Texas Annual Conference
held in Austin
in November 1858. Many readers of this
blog already know that the MECS General Conference of 1866 changed the Discipline to allow lay representation
in the annual and general conferences.
Less well known is that informal lay representation had already
occurred under the name “lay co-operation.”
Here is the way Bishop Pierce later described it.
Austin is beautiful located and is a prosperous town—the thriving
capital of a great and growing state. .
. The session was short, pleasant, and I trust, profitable. Here we had for the first time in the history
of this Conference, ‘lay co-operation.’
Pierce then went on to list his objections to lay
co-operation. His first objection was
that the increased representation would be a burden on the host community. In this era attendees were fed and housed
among the community rather than hotels. Increasing the number of delegates
would also increase the number of beds and meals the host community needed to
provide. He objected to the possibility
of lay delegates “. . .representation
involves the necessity of election by popular vote, from which evil may the
Lord deliver Methodism.” Thirdly, “. . .
it is a mockery of the delegates, for they have neither vote nor power—all they suggest. .. .” Fourthly .
annual conferences do no have the right to legislate (only the General
Conference has that power). Fifthly, the slippery slope argument—will every
quarterly conference want lay representation?
Bishop Pierce then pointed out the power that laity did have in
the church—as stewards and trustees—they controlled the property—what else
could they want? He also argued that lay
delegates would just follow instructions from their pastors anyway.
When lay delegates did appear after the disciplinary change mentioned above, Pierce’s biographer commented that he embraced the change and welcomed the lay delegates.
When lay delegates did appear after the disciplinary change mentioned above, Pierce’s biographer commented that he embraced the change and welcomed the lay delegates.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home