This Week in Texas Methodist History March 17
Women Assume More Leadership Roles, March 17, 1919
The General Conference of the MECS in 1918 took
account of the feminist movement of the early 20th century by
removing restrictions that previous conferences had placed on women. Churches responded to the removal of the
discriminatory language in the Discipline by elected women as delegates to
Annual Conference.
General Conference was held in May, and the
following November the Journal still listed Laymen in the official roll call of
Conference. The reason there were no women is that the
disciplinary changes voted on at General Conference had to ratified by the
annual conferences meeting in the first regular session following the General
Conference. Accordingly On Wednesday,
November 27, 1918, Bishop Ainsworth presented the following resolution to the
Texas Annual Conference meeting in Timpson.
“Shall lay members be eligible to all
conferences, boards, and lay offices of the church without regard to sex?” The question carried 141 to 3.
The next
year the 1919 Texas Conference Journal
lists the following women as lay delegates:
Mrs. H. G. King, Mrs. L. Gooch, Mrs. Hattie Gardner, Mrs. C. L. Turner, Miss E. L. Hill, and Mrs. Cone Johnson.
Equally significant was the election of women to
local church offices. On March 17, 1919,
the Houston Post found the election of
women to the position of local church steward so important that it ran a major
story, complete with pictures, of the first three women in Houston to be elected to the office of
steward. The three women were members
of Trinity MECS (later Northside). They
were Mrs. J. M. Washam, Mrs. W. C. Dill,
and Mrs. E. H. Haver. The Post
also reported that the church in Texas
City had already elected women to the position of
steward, and therefore claimed the honor of being first in the area.
The election of three women to the position of
steward is particularly intriguing.
Stewards were responsible for the facilities and finances of the local
church. The position is now knows as “Trustee.” As the name implies, the Stewards bear
significant legal responsibilities. Was
the position of steward an extension of the traditional role of women as
managers of the household? Or was it a
progressive move? You decide.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home